Asus PRIME B350M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350M-A  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '18 at 07:04
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 713
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 1,045
65% 1,045 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1449 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 94.7
54% 78.1 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 61
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 298 306 303 229 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 370
Write 354
Mixed 322
SusWrite 273
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 44.5
146% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 218
158% 208 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 118%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
11GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 330
Mixed 88.5
65% 298 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 13.4
55% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.1
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 19.6
16% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
46GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 62 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 61.8
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 63.3
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36%
Great: 69%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
245GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 111
Mixed 103
SusWrite 98.9
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 79%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
485GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 98 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 74.7
Write 101
Mixed 52
SusWrite 98.9
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
187% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
30GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 158
Write 63.9
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 34.7
95% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.8
148% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 35.1
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 29.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350M-A Builds (Compare 2,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $384
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback