Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '18 at 23:14
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 188
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 458
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 136
Parallax 128
104% 130 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 120
Splatting 102
86% 105 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 161 121 117 118 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.9% Good
Read 248
Write 233
Mixed 217
SusWrite 144
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 38.1
126% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 199
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 124%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
33GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 90 97 98 107 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 168
Write 102
Mixed 119
SusWrite 90.1
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
186GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46% Average
Read 89
Write 90.5
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 71.4
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $580
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback