PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus M51BC (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK M51BC |
Memory | 8.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140107 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 01 '18 at 18:13 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 400 389 407 406 427 MB/s
|
84.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
64GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 112 132 127 117 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Desk 6TB
71GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
526GB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
345GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
|
10%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 97x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 11x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 16x |
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples | 12x |
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $298 |