Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '18 at 05:15
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 185
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 474
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18.8
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 20
Splatting 27.1
21% 25.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 92 95 94 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 68.3
Write 77.3
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 93.5
52% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 62%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
441GB free
Firmware: 1B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 64 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 62
Write 67.3
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 65.5
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 112 118 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65% Good
Read 110
Write 33.8
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 114
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
261% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 32.4
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $262
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback