Asus H61M-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-D (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 179 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 337 43% 326 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8528) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.03 Reflection 45 Parallax 40.1 0% 28.4 fps	Splatting 37.9 39% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 48.8 Write 43.5 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 0.2 24% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 40%
Okstor iStorage 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 619GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 2.3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 1.2 2% 2.93 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 1.5 348% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 19%
Okstor iStorage 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 228GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 83.8 Write 2.3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 1.2 17% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 7.5 1,224% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 1x8GB 5,321 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-D Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-D

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	36x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	27x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	23x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	41x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	14x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	7x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	7x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	8x
99U5584-003.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 8GBKingstonBench 54%, 10 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16