Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20G8000UAU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Intel powered classmate PC
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161220
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '18 at 12:50
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Memory 28.9 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 37.1 18% 27.6 Pts	4-Core 56.3 8-Core 62.8 8% 59.5 Pts	64-Core 71.4 4% 71.4 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 5057) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4424 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 2.09 0% 1.36 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1001 128GB 1,303 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 97 56 30 36 35 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.2% Poor	Read 202 Write 108 Mixed 92.2 SusWrite 56.8 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 8.6 26% 8.67 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 97 DQ Mixed 97.5 80% 115 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x4GB 4,437 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 261 15% 261 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16