Asus F2A85-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '18 at 21:29
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 75
2-Core 148
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 210
29% 213 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Lighting 52.1
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 65
42% 50.7 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 43.2
35% 42.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 220 186 180 179 183 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65% Good
Read 240
Write 221
Mixed 218
SusWrite 190
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 36.3
116% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 164
123% 165 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65%
Great: 124%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
61GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 115 112 119 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 216
Write 172
Mixed 174
SusWrite 116
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 29.7
103% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 126
101% 144 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
662GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 86 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47% Average
Read 76.8
Write 87.8
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 87.3
51% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47%
Great: 67%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
68GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 117 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 117
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 82%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 128GB-$36
94GB free, PID 558b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 31
Write 9.5
Mixed 17
SusWrite 12.7
21% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.7
111% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX KHX2400C11D3/4GX KHX2400C11D3/4GX KHX2400C11D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V PRO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V PRO - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $284
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback