HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory123.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '18 at 03:49
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.4% Very good
1-Core 117
2-Core 203
77% 160 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 790
75% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,086
73% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 526
Reflection 516
Parallax 562
138% 535 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 514
Splatting 282
135% 356 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 134%
Great: 145%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$249
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW75H0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 693 824 885 795 775 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,322
Write 1,032
Mixed 824
SusWrite 794
222% 993 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 51.2
188% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 490
388% 554 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 185%
Great: 255%
SanDisk Extreme 480GB-$399
198GB free
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 202 198 193 193 190 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 380
Write 210
Mixed 234
SusWrite 195
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 22.4
78% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 137
109% 156 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 67%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$60
447GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 404 401 187 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67% Good
Read 359
Write 392
Mixed 329
SusWrite 271
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 14.5
88% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 29.4
80% 167 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67%
Great: 70%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
477GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1839 1838 1839 1840 1841 1807 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2102
Write 1834
Mixed 946
SusWrite 1,834
376% 1,679 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 61.8
218% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 773
DQ Mixed 836
628% 841 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 301%
Great: 358%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$98
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 192 194 193 194 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 191
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CRC Kingston 9965640-004.C00G Kingston 9965662-008.A01G Kingston 9965662-008.A01G Kingston 9965662-008.A01G Kingston 9965662-008.A01G Kingston 9965640-004.C00G M393A2K43BB1-CRC 128GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 48.2
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 129%
Great: 130%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback