Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '18 at 14:14
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 119 56% 89 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 365 36% 292 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.9% Very good	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 103 Parallax 139 61% 105 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 143 Splatting 116 103% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM01B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 53971 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 547 (B1) Unknown 73 73 962 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 48 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 315 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21461597743	38.6% Below average	Read 347 Write 141 Mixed 93.3 42% 194 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 6.23 52% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 37.3 DQ Mixed 7.18 12% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 63%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 395 (03) Spinup time 192 170 3400 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 426 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 35 35 47641 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 411 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 253 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 172 (C2) HDA temperature 107 95 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	73.1% Very good	Read 105 Write 149 Mixed 94.4 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.23 104% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 510GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 100 253 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 240 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 270 (C2) HDA temperature 110 105 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	79.3% Very good	Read 139 Write 137 Mixed 62.9 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.25 90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 309GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 84 84 5600 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 766 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 11588 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 58024 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 733 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 1 1 599 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 44 690487336 (C2) HDA temperature 59 43 129539506217 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 93398 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 88 15118 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	53.3% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 93.4 Mixed 47.5 57% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.4 114% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 693GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 7427 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 81 67 5828 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 707 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 58323 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 746 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 8 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 39 261993398314 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 91 91 5004 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 2347 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 764	69.8% Good	Read 115 Write 128 Mixed 80.5 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.82 4K Mixed 0.61 151% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 17.4 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 13.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16