Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3612QM 11,760 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 163 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 392 44% 344 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 M200 / HD 8500M 287 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 3800) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 3.06 3% 4.17 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.74 4% 5.16 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 3 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 53 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 359210809	90.5% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 409 Mixed 419 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 38.3 119% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 78.3 86% 144 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB 9,135 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.9 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	302x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	218x
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	134x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	671x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	230x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	15x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	45x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	19x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	96x
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 27%, 4,598 samples	76x
RMT3170EF68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,466 samples	63x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16