Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '18 at 15:13
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 232 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 745 74% 604 Pts	64-Core 951 59% 951 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4991) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.8% Very good	Lighting 97.5 Reflection 102 Parallax 91.8 79% 97 fps	MRender 87.6 Gravity 88.3 Splatting 78.1 69% 84.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14940 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3992 (B1) Unknown 91 91 109 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 333 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30124540891	58.9% Above average	Read 521 Write 185 Mixed 185 65% 297 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 11.5 87% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 60.5 DQ Mixed 11.6 18% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 105GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11052 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2574 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 61 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 71 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12666896783	94.3% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 411 Mixed 420 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 37.4 137% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 64 70% 118 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 59GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4837 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1123 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9424571945	86.8% Excellent	Read 517 Write 413 Mixed 417 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 20.1 118% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 67.2 72% 120 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 9GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13217 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3521 (B1) Unknown 98 98 54 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 61 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 273 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13375155273	75.2% Very good	Read 522 Write 298 Mixed 264 79% 361 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 18.8 107% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 68.9 63% 95.3 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 116%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 41GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 208 182 4583 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6543 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27731 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6085 (BE) vendor-specific 63 42 37 (C2) HDA temperature 113 92 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 19 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.2% Poor	Read 51.1 Write 50.3 Mixed 47.7 37% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.32 80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 35%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB 1,256 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.18% Terrible	Read 25.1 Write 10.6 Mixed 14.1 19% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.29 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.01 35% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.18% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 44.9 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 35.7 115% 40.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 41.5 SC Mixed 29.3 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Master SLI/ac Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac - $150

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	158x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	55x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	48x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	34x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	26x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	22x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	17x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $679

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac - $150

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)