Fujitsu AMILO Li 1718

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Windows Vista is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (2GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu AMILO Li 1718 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU AMILO Li 1718
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows Vista
BIOS Date	20070614
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '16 at 22:37
Run Duration	322 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core Duo T2450 314 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U23, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Memory 33.9 1-Core 7.1 2-Core 7.1 14% 16 Pts	4-Core 14.7 8-Core 8.3 2% 11.5 Pts	64-Core 12.3 1% 12.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200M Fijitsu Siemens(1734 10FB) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 7.01.01.569 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.08 0% 0.09 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.01G04 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 185 183 1708 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3879 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6772 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3811 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 295 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 183 183 53245 (C2) HDA temperature 103 91 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	17.4% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 29.3 Mixed 10.5 17% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.25 66% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 34%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1TB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.1% Very poor	Read 18.9 Write 16.8 Mixed 17.6 23% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 49%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 246GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.68% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 16.4 Mixed 8.56 18% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.3 48% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.68% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	5.77% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 0.4 1% 0.43 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu AMILO Li 1718

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)