ECS H110M4-C3D_C3V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H110M4-C3D_C3V (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20161208
Uptime	12.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '18 at 08:43
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 90.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 211 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 394 55% 408 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 365.10 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Lighting 4.63 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.28 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 3.77 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896960696 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 246 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1787 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 238 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 246 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 246 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 184685101090 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	93.6% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 170 Mixed 159 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.14 72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.7% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11.2 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 10.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M4-C3D_C3V Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS H110M4-C3D_C3V

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	10x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	7x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	6x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
PH4-CE240 240GBBench 61%, 688 samples	2x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	2x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 1x8GBUnknownBench 36%, 2,477 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GBKingstonBench 76%, 38,955 samples	2x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $269

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16