Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180115
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '18 at 22:47
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 75.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 239 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 909 80% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,264 78% 1,264 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.46 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 143 Parallax 135 108% 136 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 128 Splatting 106 94% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 2,062 Write 1,180 Mixed 1,163 324% 1,469 MB/s	4K Read 49.7 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 21 147% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 45.5 DQ Write 86.2 DQ Mixed 20.7 28% 50.8 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$95 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 155 Mixed 128 112% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.22 86% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB 5,116 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 609GB free Firmware: MU2OA720 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 130 130 12895715493 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1073 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1699 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 445 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1073 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1073 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 197569478691 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.2% Very good	Read 133 Write 129 Mixed 131 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.17 78% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$95 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 449GB free Firmware: 0001 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 160 Mixed 149 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.21 76% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 366GB free Firmware: 0001 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65% Good	Read 95.3 Write 129 Mixed 66.1 72% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.57 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.51 351% 3.56 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 90%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 333GB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 115 Write 129 Mixed 108 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.24 78% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 2,519 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 30.1 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 25.6 76% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16