Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds)
Memory	59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140725
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '18 at 19:45
Run Duration	333 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$90 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Memory 96.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 227 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 678 70% 567 Pts	64-Core 871 54% 871 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 5360) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 4.12 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 6.04 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1886 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 85 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12195475802
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1504 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 142 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 55 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 66 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12001481509
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 954GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	376% Outstanding	Read 2,430 Write 2,565 Mixed 2,509 560% 2,502 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 220 4K Mixed 88.4 323% 123 MB/s	DQ Read 580 DQ Write 438 DQ Mixed 252 258% 423 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 376% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 954GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	377% Outstanding	Read 2,438 Write 2,563 Mixed 2,482 558% 2,494 MB/s	4K Read 62.6 4K Write 220 4K Mixed 89.5 326% 124 MB/s	DQ Read 580 DQ Write 442 DQ Mixed 253 259% 425 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 377% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 954GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	376% Outstanding	Read 2,441 Write 2,551 Mixed 2,466 556% 2,486 MB/s	4K Read 61.9 4K Write 221 4K Mixed 88.6 324% 124 MB/s	DQ Read 582 DQ Write 439 DQ Mixed 253 259% 425 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 376% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 954GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	377% Outstanding	Read 2,444 Write 2,563 Mixed 2,491 560% 2,499 MB/s	4K Read 62.2 4K Write 220 4K Mixed 89.3 325% 124 MB/s	DQ Read 581 DQ Write 433 DQ Mixed 252 257% 422 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 377% Great: 425%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22492 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 177 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2537842132	82.1% Excellent	Read 269 Write 215 Mixed 220 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 45.1 162% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 92.4 94% 153 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 151GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22498 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 177 (B1) Unknown 98 98 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 58 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 133 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 60456643575	83.6% Excellent	Read 269 Write 215 Mixed 220 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 45.8 167% 56.8 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 93.7 94% 153 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDN724040ALE640 4TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 685GB free Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 76 (03) Spinup time 140 140 51572769368 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 667 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 35 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 35139 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 255 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2052 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2052 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 167505166369 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.7% Good	Read 145 Write 86.9 Mixed 96.5 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.19 87% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 93%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 150 Write 159 Mixed 94.8 169% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.63 4K Mixed 0.2 99% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 105%
BUFFALO External HDD 4TB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 150GB free, PID 0257 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 85.7 Write 82.8 Mixed 85.3 109% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.22 79% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2400 C10 8x8GB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	MC Read 52.7 MC Write 51.5 MC Mixed 50.1 147% 51.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 52.7 76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	434x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	383x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	296x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	100x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	77x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	61x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	29x
Dominator DHX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 73%, 416 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 4x8GBCorsairBench 88%, 441 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $812

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16