Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A39
Motherboard	MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '18 at 12:23
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 11,837 User benchmarks, average bench 42% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 130 52% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 223 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37% Below average	Lighting 48.1 Reflection 33 Parallax 40.6 39% 40.6 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 43.7 Splatting 38.5 33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10348 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2017 (B1) Unknown 98 98 33 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 47 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 147 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15736004916	92.3% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 400 Mixed 185 80% 361 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 38.1 132% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 73.6 77% 127 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Mx 16GB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 114 Write 10.9 Mixed 11.2 37% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.02 44% 3.92 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x4GB-$20 876 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.4% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	7x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $235

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16