Asrock P67 Pro3 SE

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Pro3 SE (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110622
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '18 at 00:22
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 206 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 522 54% 435 Pts	64-Core 523 32% 523 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% XFX(1682 7266) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	9.01% Terrible	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 20.8 9% 14.8 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 15 Splatting 9.74 8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB 9,379 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 197GB free Firmware: CXM03D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10692 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4292 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 94 94 214 (B2) Unknown 94 94 212 (B3) Unknown 95 95 384 (B4) Unknown 95 95 7680 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E8) Unknown 94 94 3820 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11132465392 (F2) Unknown 99 99 14363550479	37.5% Below average	Read 214 Write 188 Mixed 179 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 12 53% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 41.6 DQ Mixed 12.4 15% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 80%
SanDisk X210 128GB-$149 146 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: X210400 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 5306 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 214 (A6) Unknown 100 100 6 (A7) Unknown 100 100 25 (A8) Unknown 100 100 138 (A9) Unknown 100 100 150 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 46 (AE) Unknown 100 100 107 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 46 197570002984 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 309 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1279 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1705 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2062 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	60.4% Good	Read 357 Write 298 Mixed 232 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 12.5 86% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 14.8 27% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 97%
Toshiba MG03ACA300 3TB 1,003 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2.5TB free Firmware: FL1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 9281 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 833 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 766 (0A) Spinup retry count 116 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 92 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 24 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 984 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 180389675047 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 317 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 191 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	82.8% Excellent	Read 154 Write 134 Mixed 115 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.53 4K Mixed 0.47 130% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 94%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150 19,279 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 453GB free Firmware: MS2OA5Q0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 79 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698548 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2706 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 29 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 34703 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2052 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2706 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2706 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 197569347613 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 54	84.2% Excellent	Read 146 Write 147 Mixed 137 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.22 92% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 99%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 55GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 179 175 6025 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13851 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 45288 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1997 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 469 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13900 (C2) HDA temperature 120 91 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5225 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	28% Poor	Read 48.7 Write 48.2 Mixed 16.6 28% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.34 100% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF Samsung M378B2873EH1-CF8 99U5471-040.A00LF Samsung M378B2873EH1-CF8 18GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 8192, 1024, 8192, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.3% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Pro3 SE Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Pro3 SE

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	24x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	20x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	4x
9905458-026.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 735 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16