User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 18%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardPOSITIVO Z100
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 20:04
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron N2808
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
SC Int 36.2
SC Float 20.8
SC Mixed 25.8
22% 27.6 Pts
QC Int 67.7
QC Float 42.4
QC Mixed 54.3
12% 54.8 Pts
MC Int 74.2
MC Float 42.9
MC Mixed 53.9
9% 57 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Device(1297 2041) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3
Parallax 3
1% 2.87 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.7
1% 3.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 87.8
Mixed 93.3
71% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 8.26
Mixed 9.72
18% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.65
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.84
75% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown N3S02H1600E-L R0 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback