MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160525
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 18:22
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 784
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 965
60% 965 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 59.9
55% 64.6 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 61
Splatting 52.7
49% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
362GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,663
Write 1,967
Mixed 2,053
495% 2,228 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 55.8
197% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 107
121% 210 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 299%
Great: 340%
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 519
Write 436
Mixed 509
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 14.2
96% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 13.9
73% 169 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 110%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
223GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 508
Mixed 513
115% 514 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 14.3
97% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 14
80% 185 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92%
Great: 111%
OCZ VERTEX-PLUS 60GB
35GB free
Firmware: 3.50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 176
Write 83.4
Mixed 115
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 4.08
40% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 45.9
DQ Write 9.14
DQ Mixed 4.18
9% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 36%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
250GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 95.9
Write 77.8
Mixed 79.1
63% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.33
72% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
44GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 71.2
Write 58.2
Mixed 72
51% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.39
91% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 42.5
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 22.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 111%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) - $289

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $1,028
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback