Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.46%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 12:23
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron N2930
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.46% Terrible
SC Int 8.2
SC Float 4.7
SC Mixed 6
5% 6.3 Pts
QC Int 31.2
QC Float 18.8
QC Mixed 23.4
6% 24.5 Pts
MC Int 32.1
MC Float 18.2
MC Mixed 23.7
4% 24.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 4.46%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.8
1% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.2
1% 3.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Phison SSBP128GTMC0-S10C 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 246
Write 113
Mixed 218
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 9.38
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 6.95
29% 9.31 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 7.53
8% 12.3 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron MT41K256M16TW 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 25%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aptio CRB Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 21%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMI Aptio CRB

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $64
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback