To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 12:10
Run Duration371 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
SC Int 34.5
SC Float 20.5
SC Mixed 25.7
22% 26.9 Pts
QC Int 55.1
QC Float 33.1
QC Mixed 46.7
10% 45 Pts
MC Int 54.5
MC Float 30.4
MC Mixed 46.3
7% 43.7 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 15%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.9
1% 2.7 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.1
1% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 262
Write 248
Mixed 218
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 4.13
28% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 6.5
10% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 3.63
Mixed 5.65
11% 12 MB/s
4K Read 3.52
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
14% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.7
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.6
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 259
16% 259 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 3,331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $106
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback