Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 11:52
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 196
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 378
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Device(107D 2727) 1GB
CLim: 725 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 18
Parallax 13.7
12% 15.7 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 18
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 1100 SATA 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0DL003 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 309
Write 166
Mixed 204
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 13.9
75% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 13.1
15% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
897GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 177
Mixed 159
126% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.72
4K Mixed 0.35
143% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 109%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
262GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 62.5
Mixed 36.1
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.24
77% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
138GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 93.8
74% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.39
112% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $233
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback