User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardFOXCONN G41MXP/G41MXP-V
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110408
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 10:55
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon E5450-$220
Socket775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
40.5% Average
SC Int 73.7
SC Float 42.8
SC Mixed 54.5
46% 57 Pts
QC Int 296
QC Float 172
QC Mixed 212
52% 227 Pts
MC Int 294
MC Float 171
MC Mixed 213
34% 226 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$190
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 28.9
10% 31.6 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 34
Splatting 34.2
14% 33.1 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Eaget SSD 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.2S Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 207
Write 199
Mixed 155
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 2.76
58% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 2.82
15% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$92
654GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 145
Write 133
Mixed 94
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.17
100% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
239GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 82.5
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 106%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$69
170GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 107
Write 99.7
Mixed 76.8
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.18
81% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback