Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 06:27
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 610
67% 529 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 90.3
61% 75.7 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 78.3
56% 67.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.3% Very good
Read 263
Write 211
Mixed 217
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 41.9
143% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 22.3
39% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
400GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 145
Write 131
Mixed 122
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 125GB
116GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 9.6
Mixed 10.4
16% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.53
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.37
45% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $493
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback