Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '18 at 16:18
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 136
58% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 434
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.5% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 110
Parallax 95.5
85% 103 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 94.5
Splatting 93.3
77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
105GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 451
Write 252
Mixed 263
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 21.8
94% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 31.9
39% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 123%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 146
Write 168
Mixed 130
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 9.29
61% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 45.4
DQ Mixed 9.84
14% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20
177GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 67.7
Mixed 55.7
44% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.27
64% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback