Asrock 880G Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock 880G Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '18 at 13:52
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-6300-$57
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.7% Above average
SC Int 83.5
SC Float 70.7
SC Mixed 75.1
61% 76.4 Pts
QC Int 259
QC Float 223
QC Mixed 247
55% 243 Pts
MC Int 338
MC Float 290
MC Mixed 331
48% 319 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.3% Average
Lighting 135
Reflection 116
Parallax 128
41% 126 fps
MRender 83.5
Gravity 122
Splatting 83.7
42% 96.3 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$50
226GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 339
Write 293
Mixed 296
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 16.4
82% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 54.4
DQ Mixed 16.9
20% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 127%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 174
Write 163
Mixed 154
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 12.2
59% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 36.2
DQ Mixed 12.3
14% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
63GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 48.5
Write 48.1
Mixed 48.7
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.31
90% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 36%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$65
48GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 109
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.39
115% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 73%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15
7GB free, PID 168e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 22.9
Mixed 22.6
31% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.36
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.43
71% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905403-153.A00LF 9905402-587.A00LF 9905402-587.A00LF 6GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 880G Extreme3 Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 880G Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $368
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $369Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $148SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback