Asrock 880G Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 880G Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 13:52
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$57 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 124 59% 93.8 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 285 32% 254 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 44.9 Reflection 44.5 Parallax 40 37% 43.1 fps	MRender 39.8 Gravity 40.5 Splatting 36.4 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 226GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 7 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 52 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 54286397	57.7% Above average	Read 339 Write 293 Mixed 296 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 16.4 82% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 54.4 DQ Mixed 16.9 20% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6707 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1822 (B1) Unknown 97 97 46 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 37 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 93 93 6621 (EB) Unknown 99 99 222 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20084768490	35.7% Below average	Read 174 Write 163 Mixed 154 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 12.2 59% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 36.2 DQ Mixed 12.3 14% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132 6,580 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 63GB free Firmware: V5DOA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 111 111 25792020813 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 21220 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 22707 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 8240 (C0) Power-off retract count 83 83 21382 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 83 83 21382 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 240518430766 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	27.8% Poor	Read 48.5 Write 48.1 Mixed 48.7 36% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.31 90% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 35%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 48GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 167 4166 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9403 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15583 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5362 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 568 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8834 (C2) HDA temperature 101 87 46 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.8% Good	Read 115 Write 104 Mixed 109 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.39 115% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15 505 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 7GB free, PID 168e Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 22.9 Mixed 22.6 31% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.36 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.43 71% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-153.A00LF 9905402-587.A00LF 9905402-587.A00LF 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 800, 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 880G Extreme3 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880G Extreme3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 B55AMDBench 54%, 3,005 samples	2x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	1x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	2x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	2x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	2x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	1x

RAM
F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 38%, 527 samples	2x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GBCorsairBench 43%, 1,328 samples	1x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $83

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16