| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121012 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 12 '18 at 22:08 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.5%
Good
|
60% 96.6 Pts
|
35% 275 Pts
|
20% 316 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 284C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.93
|
28.2%
Poor
|
27% 33.7 fps
|
31% 38.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
56.5%
Above average
|
62% 278 MB/s
|
79% 26.3 MB/s
|
23% 39.4 MB/s
|
|
|
80%
Very good
|
97% 129 MB/s
|
110% 1.14 MB/s
| |
|
|
46.6%
Average
|
47% 64.5 MB/s
|
92% 0.88 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M379B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.1%
Below average
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
28% 9.8 GB/s
|
58% 69.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 299 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 89x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 54x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $783 |