| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1440x900x4294967296 szín, 1440x900x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20140117 |
| Uptime | 5.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 11 '18 at 18:16 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.9%
Above average
|
57% 91.3 Pts
|
28% 208 Pts
|
13% 212 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
|
32.5%
Below average
|
33% 37.1 fps
|
31% 37.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
77%
Very good
|
94% 420 MB/s
|
111% 38.5 MB/s
|
22% 36.9 MB/s
|
|
|
52.9%
Above average
|
68% 89.8 MB/s
|
117% 1.21 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX2400C11D3/4GX 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
36.1%
Below average
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
54% 73.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 65 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 10x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 10x |
| A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 5x |
| Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $323 |