Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141008
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '18 at 01:53
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 124 2-Core 221 85% 146 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 841 81% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,036 64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 109 Parallax 96 90% 105 fps	MRender 91.7 Gravity 94.6 Splatting 97.6 78% 94.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 287GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1155 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4029769008	89% Excellent	Read 523 Write 411 Mixed 427 101% 454 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 34.9 119% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 15.7 47% 95 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 129%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49 13,478 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 225GB free Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1092 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 341 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 57 (A3) Unknown 100 100 34 (A4) Unknown 100 100 115447 (A5) Unknown 100 100 155 (A6) Unknown 100 100 58 (A7) Unknown 100 100 112 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 97 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 317 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 46 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 239044 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1550272 (F2) Unknown 100 100 924159 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1847152	75.1% Very good	Read 515 Write 430 Mixed 470 105% 471 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 17.6 89% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 58.8 DQ Mixed 64.5 42% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 25692 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 401 (B1) Unknown 95 95 89 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 53 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 71 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33188184549	76% Very good	Read 511 Write 410 Mixed 420 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 19.3 96% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 62.2 DQ Mixed 17.7 21% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$84 1,914 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 39.9 MC Write 43 MC Mixed 36.5 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 19.4 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 57.5 70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	466x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	109x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	85x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	75x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	46x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	9x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $997

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16