| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170607 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 09 '18 at 06:10 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.8%
Good
|
60% 97 Pts
|
42% 348 Pts
|
28% 452 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.2
|
56.2%
Above average
|
58% 71.5 fps
|
52% 62.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
||||
|
|
73.3%
Very good
|
100% 133 MB/s
|
162% 1.83 MB/s
| |
|
|
87.6%
Excellent
|
105% 141 MB/s
|
201% 2.19 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.1%
Average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
58% 69.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 431x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |