| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B |
| Memory | 9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121102 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 23 '16 at 21:22 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
50.2%
Above average
|
50% 76.8 Pts
|
17% 125 Pts
|
8% 122 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
1.95%
Terrible
|
2% 2.24 fps
|
2% 2.66 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
96% 127 MB/s
|
76% 0.78 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB
21GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
9.32%
Terrible
|
26% 20.6 MB/s
|
18% 0.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.9%
Poor
|
25% 8.9 GB/s
|
25% 8.63 GB/s
|
49% 81.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 64x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 162x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 69x |
| GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples | 40x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $228 |