Jpsacouto Intel powered classmate PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJpsacouto Intel powered classmate PC  (all builds)
Motherboard Intel powered classmate PC
Memory0.8 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit cores, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '18 at 23:15
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10% Very poor
Memory 19
1-Core 4.4
2-Core 5.9
8% 9.78 Pts
4-Core 7.6
8-Core 5.1
1% 6.35 Pts
64-Core 8.4
0% 8.4 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HS030GB 30GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FY100-07 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 27.5
Mixed 18.5
19% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.12
28% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x63.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
7.03% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.33 GB/s
Latency 328
12% 328 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback