Emachines EL1360G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Emachines EL1360G (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines EL1360G
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110902
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '18 at 08:31
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 48.1 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 31.1 23% 31.8 Pts	4-Core 31.7 8-Core 31.9 4% 31.8 Pts	64-Core 31.5 2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0592) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721680PLA380 80GB-$41 2,269 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: P21OAB3A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 167 167 12893683817 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 239 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 31 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 21050 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 239 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 565 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 565 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 214749151276 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	37.2% Below average	Read 65.1 Write 64.2 Mixed 64.8 49% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.35 95% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 40%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 457GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 21.2 Mixed 21.3 27% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.35 75% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 44%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 0048 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 7.73 Mixed 11.8 15% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.48 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.005 13% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unifosa HU524303EP0200 2x2GB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EL1360G Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 12%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Emachines EL1360G

CPU
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	4x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	4x
RX 6600AMD $447Bench 86%, 20,866 samples	1x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	1x

RAM
HU524303EP0200 1x2GBUnifosaBench 20%, 59 samples	1x
HU524303EP0200 2x2GBUnifosaBench 33%, 393 samples	1x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Emachines EL1360G

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Emachines EL1360G

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)