Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 123% UFO	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 116% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE (all builds)
Memory	38.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '18 at 22:19
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 158 2-Core 316 103% 189 Pts	4-Core 613 8-Core 979 98% 796 Pts	64-Core 1,278 79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2920 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 172 Parallax 156 133% 164 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 162 Splatting 115 105% 129 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 818GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 2,614 Write 1,978 Mixed 2,062 493% 2,218 MB/s	4K Read 61.3 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 60.3 241% 85.1 MB/s	DQ Read 419 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 142 171% 301 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 372%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 660GB free Firmware: X41320RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13780 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 512 (A5) Unknown 100 100 9699445 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 36 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1059 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 103 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 62 266289020967 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 141734838305 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1708 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2424 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2243 (F2) Unknown 253 253 16113 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	72.1% Very good	Read 498 Write 345 Mixed 327 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 20.7 90% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 39.6 46% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 308GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21852 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1158 (B1) Unknown 97 97 62 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 41 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 146 (F1) Unknown 99 99 62050519728	104% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 411 Mixed 423 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 43.9 165% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 46.4 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 94.8 92% 138 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3.5TB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 4917 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 51 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 110 (0A) Spinup retry count 101 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 51 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 32 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 53 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159544367 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 100 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 537 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 4253 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 714 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 95 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 12773 (0A) Spinup retry count 114 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 504 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 588 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2105 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 266288955439 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 72 72 11528 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 573 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	59.6% Above average	Read 117 Write 90.7 Mixed 88.9 74% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.25 88% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 104%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 128GB 752 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 105GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 183 Write 63.6 Mixed 10.3 80% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.94 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.01 15% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-16GVR F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-16GVR 48GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.8% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 24.4 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 31.2 SC Mixed 25.7 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	674x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	163x
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	134x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	221x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	83x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	83x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	82x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	74x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	97x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $827

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16