HP Pavilion TS Sleekbook 15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP Pavilion TS Sleekbook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 193B
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '16 at 02:02
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A8-4555M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
23% Poor
1-Core 43.8
2-Core 62.1
26% 52.9 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 106
15% 107 Pts
64-Core 105
7% 105 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600G
HP(103C 193B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 13
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 12.3
3% 12.7 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 13
3% 10.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 458
Write 331
Mixed 383
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 3.69
44% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 29.2
40% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.7
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Pavilion TS Sleekbook 15 Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion TS Sleekbook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $22
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback