Fujitsu FUTRO S920

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu FUTRO S920 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3313-A1
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160902
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '18 at 04:29
Run Duration	318 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD GX-415GA SOC HD Graphics 224 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Memory 51.6 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 46.5 28% 40.4 Pts	4-Core 93.7 8-Core 92.2 12% 92.9 Pts	64-Core 92.7 6% 92.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro V3900 1,362 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 0106) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.24% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 2.62 2% 2.86 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.24 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 2.24% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100 901 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8597367029 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 90013924599168 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 271 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 92 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 51 68 42954129459 (C2) HDA temperature 51 68 42954129459 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8597367029 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 8597367029 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 8597367029 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 77309411329 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11904 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6587 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6587 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6641 (F4) Unknown 97 97 5898330	43.1% Average	Read 401 Write 121 Mixed 174 50% 232 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 11.8 62% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 38.6 DQ Mixed 9.25 13% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 81%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 10GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	5% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 4.07 Mixed 5.86 10% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.94 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.003 11% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB 1,200 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FUTRO S920 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FUTRO S920

CPU
GX-415GA SOC HD GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 224 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330EAMDBench 2%, 234 samples	6x
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 1%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
GOODRAM 240GBBench 79%, 8,481 samples	1x
SH00M128GB 128GBBench 57%, 16 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	3x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16