User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	GBT___ NVDAACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte M57SLI-S4
Memory	5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091106
Uptime	18.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '18 at 18:46
Run Duration	354 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 72.8 1-Core 46.6 2-Core 93.7 45% 71 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 184 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 790GB free Firmware: CC32 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 94 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 62%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA 2TB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 663GB free Firmware: JKAO Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 96.9 Write 91.8 Mixed 86.2 69% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.42 103% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA 2TB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 663GB free Firmware: JKAO Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 88.4 Mixed 85.8 67% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.4 105% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500641AS 500GB-$76 1,952 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 249GB free Firmware: 3.AA Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 30.9 Mixed 30.9 23% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.33 75% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 33%
Hitachi HDT725032VLAT80 320GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: V54OA42A Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 131072 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8598126717 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 547 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 40160 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 539 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2207 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2207 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 257698627621 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 67	34.1% Below average	Read 58 Write 60.6 Mixed 47 41% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.34 88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 40%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA 2TB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 17GB free Firmware: JKAO Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 117 Write 117 Mixed 99.6 83% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.34 94% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA 2TB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 17GB free Firmware: JKAO Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 108 Write 116 Mixed 107 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 68%
Hitachi HDT725025VLAT80 250GB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 7GB free Firmware: V5DOA4NA Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8598061178 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8768 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 40123 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 857 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 10414 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 10414 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 236223397924 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2518	30.8% Below average	Read 58.2 Write 48.8 Mixed 40.2 37% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.35 97% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 35%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 543 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 924GB free, PID 0216 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 34.4 Mixed 33.9 44% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.35 72% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 20%
ASMedia AS2105 1TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 337GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 59.2 Write 54.6 Mixed 13.4 50% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.3 66% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 6.1 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)