Acer Aspire M3201

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M3201  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer RS780HVF
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '18 at 10:19
Run Duration624 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9550
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 54.6
34% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 123
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 31.8
31% 34.8 fps
MRender 34.6
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 33.2
28% 33.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.2% Below average
Read 184
Write 138
Mixed 117
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 9.18
48% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 29.6
DQ Mixed 9.83
12% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 96.9
Write 66.5
Mixed 50.9
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.15
58% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 67%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
257GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 76.3
Write 76
Mixed 47.4
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.32
84% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 54%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 5.99
Mixed 7.13
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
1% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 8%
General UDisk 4GB
4GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Read 9.49
Write 3.25
Mixed 4.13
6% 5.62 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.004
13% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 8.8
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 6.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3201 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3201

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback