Asus T100TAF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus T100TAF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T100TAF
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140910
Uptime22.8 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 23:56
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735F
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 29.7
28% 35.6 Pts
4-Core 57.7
8-Core 57.4
8% 57.6 Pts
64-Core 57.6
4% 57.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 182D) 1,023MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.78
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hynix HCG8e 63GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.4
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.6% Good
Read 154
Write 67.2
Mixed 75.1
74% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.61
4K Write 6.09
4K Mixed 3.89
862% 5.87 MB/s
Generic SL32G SD Card 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 21.5
Mixed 22.1
17% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.32
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 1.9
473% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback