Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 31 '18 at 00:20
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 587 59% 480 Pts	64-Core 780 48% 780 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6686) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 149 Reflection 151 Parallax 130 122% 144 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 141 Splatting 112 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 37GB free Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 238 100 4846 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2677 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 53 (A9) Unknown 100 100 30 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 19 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2327 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 100 257698037803 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4273 (F1) Unknown 253 253 664 (F2) Unknown 253 253 746	82% Excellent	Read 492 Write 412 Mixed 451 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 5.22 97% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 29.6 80% 167 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16056 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2700 (B1) Unknown 93 93 144 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 43 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 149 (F1) Unknown 99 99 54598550743	99.3% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 412 Mixed 417 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 29.2 136% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 78.7 119% 225 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 78GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6880 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 389 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 8519 (0A) Spinup retry count 107 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 385 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 164 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 784 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 227634184228 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 64 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 81 81 7902 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 553 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	92.2% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 163 Mixed 157 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 3.54 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.29 220% 2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 25GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 109 100 7550 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6174 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 35 35 47751 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2229 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 891 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 42 42 475647 (C2) HDA temperature 110 90 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.9% Below average	Read 55.7 Write 58.9 Mixed 67 46% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.28 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avexir DDR4-2400 CL16 4GB 4x4GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 35.4 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 19.7 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	225x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	86x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	10x
BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GBCrucialBench 107%, 871 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,104

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16