Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 27 '18 at 23:32
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 64.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 77% 144 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 908 80% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,884 117% 1,884 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3752) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 197 Parallax 178 125% 176 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 177 Splatting 127 118% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 250GB-$90 2,162 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 142GB free Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10568 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 229 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 93 93 227 (AE) Unknown 100 100 119 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2600 (B7) Unknown 100 100 298 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 42 249109413933 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 93 93 7 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 23934078489 (F7) Unknown 100 100 779712759 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1342633911	71.7% Very good	Read 504 Write 320 Mixed 368 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 22.3 90% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 51.4 DQ Mixed 35.6 44% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 112%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 1,852 Write 1,143 Mixed 1,175 307% 1,390 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 39.6 181% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 88.3 100% 174 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 236%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 895GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 130 130 21493842211 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4301 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 31269 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 647 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6155 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6155 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 206159216678 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	92.7% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 160 Mixed 157 121% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.22 92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 584GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7233 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2879 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28720 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 274 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 164 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2714 (C2) HDA temperature 115 103 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	66.7% Good	Read 131 Write 101 Mixed 102 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.47 126% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 85%
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 1TB-$52 1,134 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 209GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 200 195 2983 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2579 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25755 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 201 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 122 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2491 (C2) HDA temperature 119 106 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79% Very good	Read 136 Write 138 Mixed 131 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.75 4K Write 4.33 4K Mixed 0.44 202% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 120%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZB 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 2134, 2134, 2134, 2134 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	130% Outstanding	MC Read 51.2 MC Write 53.7 MC Mixed 50.2 148% 51.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 22.1 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 194%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16