Gigabyte GA-P43-ES3G

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P43-ES3G (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091105
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	May 27 '18 at 06:28
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 27.7 2-Core 55 36% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 106 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB; gtx CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Lighting 38 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 36.3 31% 34.7 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 34.8 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB 2,727 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 259 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 160 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 82 82 132 (AD) Unknown 100 100 262153 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 42 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 959	46.5% Average	Read 248 Write 245 Mixed 249 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 7.74 66% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 12.6 25% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 298GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 94 222445233 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 914 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 18998147 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 650 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 783 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 334 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 50 555221025 (C2) HDA temperature 33 50 64424509473 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 79 64 154138065 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 4294967295 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 4294967295 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 192 119 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	42.9% Average	Read 75.2 Write 74.1 Mixed 28.2 43% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.44 101% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721016CLA382 160GB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 102GB free Firmware: JPEOA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 128 128 126 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897681603 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 746 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 32 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 771 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 516 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 746 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 746 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 180389478430 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.1% Average	Read 85.4 Write 85.7 Mixed 82.4 64% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.38 90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 52%
MXT-USB Storage Device 67GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 62GB free, PID 8816 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 13.1 Mixed 8.24 15% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.71 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 7% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 97.1 41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P43-ES3G Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P43-ES3G

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	18x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	10x
GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	101x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	22x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $198

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16