Asus CG8250

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus CG8250 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8250
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120405
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '18 at 08:03
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 402 55% 407 Pts	64-Core 412 26% 412 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 142 Parallax 125 110% 134 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 129 Splatting 102 91% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 350GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1352 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 103 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 60 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1502266730
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387591592 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 632 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 879 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 165 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 641 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 641 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 188979937319 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 72
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 132 132 34388181425 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 644 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 879 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 167 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 653 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 653 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 193274970151 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 118
Poor: 51% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNNG 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNNG 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	84x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	18x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	17x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	16x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	7x

SSD
Blue 250GBWD $90Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	9x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
EL63I1C1624ZV 2x4GBAdataBench 48%, 365 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	5x
EL63I1C1624ZV EL63I1C1624ZV 16GBAdataBench 48%, 10 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $535

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16