Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Memory 45.8 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 90.2 36% 60.7 Pts	4-Core 89.7 8-Core 91.8 12% 90.8 Pts	64-Core 91.1 6% 91.1 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 39FB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4565 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.24 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 3.22 2% 2.42 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk DF4064 63GB 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.6% Very poor	Read 165 Write 104 Mixed 120 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 4.93 4K Write 7.85 4K Mixed 3.22 16% 5.34 MB/s

SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 115GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 118 Write 40.5 Mixed 52 76% 70 MB/s	4K Read 3.22 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.26 51% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 1.4 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16