Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170314
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	May 23 '18 at 20:02
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 68.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 234 76% 141 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 657 63% 519 Pts	64-Core 654 40% 654 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 62.8 Reflection 68.1 Parallax 61.1 51% 64 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 60.5 Splatting 54.7 50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 217GB free Firmware: 600ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4385555 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 4123168628176 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 981 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 296 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 35 73016737820 (C2) HDA temperature 28 35 73016737820 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4385555 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4385555 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4385555 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 93 93 73014444033 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10727 (EA) Unknown 0 0 503 (F1) Unknown 0 0 503 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1586 (F4) Unknown 99 99 196739118	65.3% Good	Read 510 Write 194 Mixed 234 68% 313 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 17.3 94% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 39.3 53% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13305 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 307 (B1) Unknown 98 98 41 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 133 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25801552152	93.1% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 415 Mixed 421 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 36.6 134% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 59.7 66% 111 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 82GB free Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 39526214 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 -86492051385898 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2075 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 300 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 49 1009320525855 (C2) HDA temperature 31 49 1009320525855 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 39526214 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 39526214 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 39526214 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15437 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11190 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11190 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6758	45.7% Average	Read 183 Write 144 Mixed 116 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 13.5 79% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 38 59% 112 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 225455024 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4448 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 3110065 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13304 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 264 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 571932703 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 114 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 302615 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 64424509471 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 77734613100242 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2845111951 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27386188640	99.9% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 160 Mixed 169 130% 172 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.15 71% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB 1,808 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.5% Very good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 24.4 72% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 21.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,066

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)