HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 16:44
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5560 659 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 158 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 448 46% 374 Pts	64-Core 715 44% 715 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Lighting 44.2 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 40.6 36% 38.1 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 40 Splatting 35 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3709 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 459 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 58 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 62 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12900921101	59.1% Above average	Read 481 Write 108 Mixed 270 62% 286 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 25 84% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 62.7 72% 126 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 450 128GB-$80 1,040 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 54GB free Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 24 24 24 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16440 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2865 (AB) Unknown 80 80 17833296 (AE) Unknown 100 100 258 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 24 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 544 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 82 82 82 (F1) Unknown 100 100 14663 (F2) Unknown 100 100 18904 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1746505837	65.2% Good	Read 475 Write 265 Mixed 306 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 20.6 70% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 81.3 89% 149 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 47316864 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13738 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 34579294132 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 30626 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3695 (B7) Unknown 96 96 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 55835557958 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 50 639893540 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 584 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 19 19 163495 (C2) HDA temperature 36 50 38654705700 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -22466973911324 (F1) Unknown 100 253 62382654133509 (F2) Unknown 100 253 70475258214695	68.5% Good	Read 125 Write 113 Mixed 111 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.38 107% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 289GB free Firmware: CC98 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 168334568 (03) Spinup time 90 87 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10266 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 165363109 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16236 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3006 (B7) Unknown 94 94 6 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 21475164172 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 56 656867367 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 434 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 11687 (C2) HDA temperature 39 44 47244640295 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 9 168334568 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -109732119427586 (F1) Unknown 100 253 425805428 (F2) Unknown 100 253 609579485	41.6% Average	Read 69.1 Write 76 Mixed 65.6 53% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.16 50% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 ID:01 98 9965525-085.A00LF 42GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 34816 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	252x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16