Toshiba SATELLITE PRO L850-1EF

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE PRO L850-1EF (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '16 at 13:59
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 143 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 196 26% 197 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.1% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 6.54 Parallax 5.31 5% 6.17 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 4.73 Splatting 5.78 4% 5.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 406 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 378 (A5) Unknown 100 100 10223739 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 29 (A8) Unknown 100 100 5 (A9) Unknown 100 100 211 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 30 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 65 279173464102 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 150324772899 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 422 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1268 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1112 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1561 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	56.3% Above average	Read 489 Write 316 Mixed 299 81% 368 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 8.37 53% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 77.8 DQ Mixed 7.06 18% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 101%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	8.84% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 8.94 Mixed 9.12 14% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.82 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.63 69% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.84% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.6% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 15.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE PRO L850-1EF

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)