| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP270E5E-K02AR |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131024 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 20 '18 at 19:35 |
| Run Duration | 279 Seconds |
| Run User | URY-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron 847-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
|
42.9%
Average
|
37% 48.7 Pts
|
6% 44.7 Pts
|
3% 50.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.75%
Terrible
|
1% 0.84 fps
|
1% 1.11 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
50% 66.3 MB/s
|
25% 0.2 MB/s
| |
|
hp v255w 16GB
8GB free, PID b107
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.27%
Terrible
|
12% 11.6 MB/s
|
15% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.8%
Very poor
|
17% 6 GB/s
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
49% 82.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV Builds (Compare 124 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 41x |
| Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples | 22x |
| Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $98 |