Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '18 at 00:40
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 449
60% 449 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 84.2
56% 73.6 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 55.7
51% 63 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
57GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 505
Write 120
Mixed 219
61% 281 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 14.4
78% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 50.5
61% 107 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 87%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 345
Write 205
Mixed 280
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 4.17
64% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 1.69
16% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA MK2565GSXN 250GB
117GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 33.6
Mixed 16.6
35% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.34
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
SanDisk Cruzer Pop 16GB
14GB free, PID 5577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 3.3
Mixed 6
10% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.31
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 1.21
118% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $393
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback