Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 20:06
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 729
70% 579 Pts
64-Core 1,783
110% 1,783 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1652 MHz, MLim: 1075 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.3
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 156
64% 104 fps
MRender 77.8
Gravity 103
Splatting 112
82% 97.5 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 2,443
Write 1,037
Mixed 1,332
352% 1,604 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 27.6
154% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 41
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 27
34% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 209%
Great: 292%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
55GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 464
Write 440
Mixed 445
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 18.2
98% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 17.8
22% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 124%
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
58GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 440
Write 238
Mixed 311
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 12.5
77% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 12
51% 114 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 91%
WD Se 4TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 130
Mixed 120
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.2
98% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 100%
WD Se 1TB (2013)-$18
197GB free
Firmware: 01.01M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 114
Mixed 107
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.08
84% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 104%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
252GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42% Average
Read 76.7
Write 69.3
Mixed 62.1
52% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.23
84% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 26.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 21.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $981
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback